Parker compound bows are an excellent option for beginners. Lightweight and easy to adjust, they feature a single cam system for consistent performance – this model has a maximum speed of 325 feet per second shooting capacity and includes a Hostage style arrow rest, an angled peep sight, and a 4-arrow quick detach quiver for extra convenience.
Parker bows are an ideal solution for those searching for an accurate and quiet compound bow. Made in Virginia with top-grade materials at competitive prices, Parker bows feature stabilizers and quivers as standard equipment – perfect for hunters. Additionally, their bows come in an assortment of camo colors for added realism!
The Parker bow features cutting-edge compound technology to increase arrow speed without the use of strings, significantly reducing bow hand shock for greater accuracy at longer ranges. Furthermore, this bow boasts a modular design that can easily be adjusted without tools and can even be fine-tuned using computer technology.
Hunters who want an accurate and powerful bow should consider the Parker GR-30 bow. With its maximum draw weight of 50 pounds and lightweight composite construction, this bow can provide precise performance at long range. Parker Bows also offers accessories to increase performance, such as stabilizers and limb dampeners to enhance its bubbles even further.
When purchasing a compound bow, it’s essential that you fully comprehend what you are purchasing. Manufacturers tend to tout their products by proclaiming them the fastest, lightest, most accurate, and quietest on the market – but speed can depend on many variables, including shooting form and weather conditions.
In this case, the dispute rests around one word: continuously. The patentee contends that the use of this term in the claim narrows its scope to only those limbs having continuously varying thickness at their first end, which Parker objected to given that elsewhere in the ‘719 Patent, there is language describing a direct attachment of bow assembly to the main beam. Ultimately, however, the court disagreed with both arguments and held that the claim does not refer to continuous variations in limb thickness variation.
Parker Bows Inc. is an industry-leading compound bow manufacturer that offers superior products at an economical price. Their bows are user-friendly and available in different sizes and draw weights for archers looking to take their skills further. Plus, their lightweight design means durability is never an issue! Parker Bows Inc. makes compound bows that help archers take their game further!
This bow is ideal for beginner archers or hunters searching for an economical yet lightweight bow option. The adjustable cam system enables users to customize draw length and let-off settings, giving the bow optimal performance and offering many color choices with pre-flexion of its limbs for smooth draw cycles and pre-flexion pre-tensioning of its draw cycle. Furthermore, its lightweight construction makes shooting comfortable over extended periods while remaining compact – ideal for hunting or target shooting!
This Parker bow features angled limbs to reduce horizontal torque created by archers and an excellent axle-to-axle ratio. Additionally, its cams feature soft, round shapes to ensure an incredibly smooth draw cycle and pre-flexion of limbs for even higher draw weights. Furthermore, these durable compounds will withstand extreme weather conditions as they will stand up well over time.
Parker contends in its argument that Claim 1 requires direct attachment of both foot stirrup and bow assembly to the main beam, although this interpretation of “mounted” is incorrect; patent illustrations clearly demonstrate otherwise; both parts are mounted indirectly via riser. Furthermore, such dual attachment would not fit within the overall design of the crossbow.
Parker also contends that Claim 2 fails to provide one skilled in the art with sufficient details about its scope as it fails to specify dimensions or a particular location for a foot stirrup on a bow, which are two requirements to demonstrate the indefiniteness of terms in claims. However, these requirements alone are insufficient to meet this burden of proof.
Parker bows are among the world’s most beloved compound bows, known for being easy to use, lightweight, affordable, and available in multiple draw lengths to meet every shooter’s individual needs. Additionally, Parker bows are made with high-grade materials and equipped with features designed to increase accuracy.
The Parker Velocity compound bow offers speed and precision at a highly reasonable cost, reaching speeds of 286 fps while offering adjustability without the need for a bow press. Constructed of 6061 aluminum for more excellent durability and efficiency than three-piece models, it features a straight cable rod to reduce horizontal torque and limb vibration.
Parker Velocity bows feature an adjustable and tunable limb stop that enables archers to quickly change the back wall thickness by rotating a module. Furthermore, their cam system can also be set for any draw weight with just one turn of a screw; their carbon composite material limbs further reduce vibrations for a quiet deer hunting experience.
This Parker Bow is the ideal bow for beginners or anyone upgrading from lower-end bubbles. It is lightweight, accurate, and comes equipped with a comfortable grip, making it easy to shoot in tight spaces. Furthermore, its T2 cam system features 90% let-off along with a dual track cable stop; additionally, its removable limb stops allow you to choose either a custom grip bare riser grip or Parker’s two-piece composite grip for extra versatility.
The court finds that dependent claim 2 of the ‘719 patent, in combination with its specification and illustrations, provides sufficient clarity as to where a foot stirrup should be located on a bow. More specifically, its limitation states, “a portion of said foot stirrup extends in a direction away from said bow assembly,” making this task evident to anyone skilled in the art.
The Parker compound bow comes with a lifetime warranty covering any defective parts or craftsmanship and is valid throughout its lifespan. However, please be aware that this does not include damage caused by misuse, neglect, dry fires, or improper use.
Warranty coverage should be an essential feature when purchasing a bow, providing peace of mind against problems with the equipment and helping to maximize return on investment. A comprehensive warranty can save you from expensive repair or replacement bills while protecting you in case of legal proceedings against its manufacturers.
Parker failed to meet its burden of showing that Claim 5 is indefinite. Reading both its specifications and patent illustrations (Figs. 1 and 3), it is evident that any foot stirrup limitation clearly narrows the scope of their invention to foot stirrups, which extend away from bow assemblies. Therefore, Parker failed to meet their burden.
Additionally, when read in context with the specification and patent illustrations, the term disputed “riser” clearly limits the invention to bow assembly components; Parker thus failed to prove that Claim 1 is indefinite.
Parker contends that Claim 1 requires direct attachment of the bow assembly to the main beam, which isn’t supported by patent illustrations or crossbow construction principles. Parker references a number of patents that cover different types of bows other than this claim at issue here.
Parker also claims that the term “approximately 13 inches,” used to describe power stroke in multiple claims of the ‘012 Patent, is indefinite because it does not define an exact range of values. However, this patent includes specific instructions as to how one ordinarily skilled in the art can measure power stroke – for instance, the distance between the hinge point and the peak of camshafts.